Thursday, October 31, 2013

NY Raises Age to Buy Cigarettes to 21

New York Raising Age to Buy Cigarettes to 21
New York Times- October 30, 2013

1.      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/nyregion/new-york-approves-law-to-raise-tobacco-purchasing-age-to-21.html

2.      Category of Problem/Issue identified in article: Health/ Legislation

3.      Level of problem/issue: State

4.      This article is concerning an “enacted” policy that has been passed to help with a problem/issue that individuals/families face.

5.      This is important to individuals and families because of the detrimental health risks caused by cigarette smoking. Putting an age restriction on the purchases of cigarettes may help decrease the number of current smokers in the United States.

6.      As noted in my previous post, the ban against cigarette displays had been dropped from the same bill increasing the age of purchasing cigarettes from 18 to 21. Well, my friends, the bill was passed and sign by Mayor Bloomberg. Quite a few people are upset about this new regulation; however, I could not be more excited. A lot of people say that individuals who are exposed to cigarettes as a child are more likely to pick up the same habit when they are older. That was not the case for my siblings and I who grew up with parents who smoked. It was the exact opposite for us. We were, however, able to witness the struggle that cigarettes imposed on our parents’ lives. The financial burden that drooped over their heads as the price of cigarettes steadily increased always caused more anxiety, and I’m sure our presentations stating that we could go on more family vacations if they ceased smoking did not help. Stating within the bill is the price of cigarettes and little cigars must be raised to at least $10.50. I can assure you that quite a few smokers might consider picking up a new habit because of this price increase. Like I stated before, I think this bill is a great thing and I wish more states would also adopt a way to decrease the number of smokers nationwide. If 85% of adult smokers began smoking before the age of 21, than hopefully less people will develop chronically fatal diseases due to this highly addictive drug.

Last Night's Rainful Causes Wastewater Spill

Wastewater spills into local river, creeks
Austin American Statesman- October 31, 2013

1. http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local-govt-politics/wastewater-spills-into-local-river-creeks/nbddh/

2. Category of Problem/Issue identified in article: Environment

3. Level of problem/issue: Local

4. This article is concerning a problem/issue that individuals/families face.

5. This affects individuals and families because of the contamination caused to rivers and creeks in the local area. This contamination raises the risk of infections and illness to local residents who come into contact with these waterways.

6. As if Austin has had enough problems with the current bouts of rain, now they really have an issue! The extreme amount of rain that had fallen late last night cause wastewater to spill into about six creeks as well as the Colorado River. Fortunately, none of the drinking water has been contaminated or this could have caused an even bigger issue than it currently has. Officials are encouraging local residents to stay away from these creeks in order to prevent any sort of infections or illness to occur in hopes of avoiding any sort of unnecessary outbreak from occurring. As torrential as last night’s rain was for the hill country, it truly can be considered a blessing. We have currently been under the worst drought that Central Texas has ever seen, even beating the 1950’s drought. Some predict this drought to last until the year 2020. What does this mean for areas like Austin? For one, our creeks, rivers, and lakes will continue to suffer. Water levels have been so low, and because new rain water is not washing them out, increasing amounts of minerals as well as harmful chemicals are prone to infect our water (the same water that we shower in and drink from). With the rain that we do get, the dry soil is quick to soak it up for survival reasons. Additionally, many families around this area, like Wimberley and Austin/Pflugerville, have had to battle the flooding effects caused by such heavy rainfall in such a short amount of time. I pray for more rain; however, continue to hope that it is a lighter, less detrimental rainfall that ensues.

Banning Dispay of Cigarettes Dropped from Bill

City Drops Bid to Ban Display of Cigarettes
New York Times- October 27, 2013


2.      Category of Problem/Issue identified in article: Health/ Legislation

3.      Level of problem/issue: State

4.      This article is concerning an “enacted” policy that has been passed to help with a problem/issue that individuals/families face.

5.      This is important to individuals and families because of the detrimental health risks caused by cigarettes. The marketing of cigarettes is one of the biggest (if not the number one) reason for the number of current smokers in the United States.

6.      Mayor Bloomberg of New York has taken huge strides in order to make the citizens of New York as well as visitors of the state the healthiest they most possibly can be. A lot of people dog and give him a hard time for being such a health nut and for infringing on their “freedom”. I, on the other hand, think that there should be more government officials and politicians with the same goal as him, though. His ultimate goal with this bill is to decrease the risk of the major chronic diseases associated with smoking and why not?! According to Lung.com, 85% of adult smokers started before the age of 21. This means that out of 100 people, that is 85 people’s lives that can prevented from a chronic disease and even death. Imagine if this was nationwide?! Lung cancer is currently the number one cause of mortality among all cancer patients both men and women.  With that being said, I agree with Mr. Bloomberg on banning the display of cigarettes. By displaying them, you are exposing these “cancer sticks” to younger adults who probably wouldn’t buy them if they weren’t visible. “Out of sight; out of mind” is the best way to describe this situation. Additionally, from personally living with smokers, I understand the struggle of trying to quit. It is tremendously easier to successfully stop smoking when you are never tempted by the sight of cigarettes. My hope is that, one day, New York as well as other states will become successful in not only increasing the age of cigarette purchases but as banning them all together.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Fake Service Dogs A Growing Problem As Pet Owners Flout Disability Rules

  1. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/10/fake-service-dogs_n_4075308.html
  2. Category of issue: Service Dogs
  3. Level of issue: National
  4. Who does this issue affect? Families/individuals
  5. Why does it affect individuals/families? This can affect many business owners and actual disabled people who really have a need for a service dog.
  6. What are your views on this issue? Even if this issue may not be as important per say as abortion or drug related issues and policies, but it does take a toll on a portion of our population, the disabled. After already having a disability due to an accident, or just by birth, these people now have to worry about the jerks who take their dogs as "service dogs" and the behavior showcased may ruin it for the real deal. Now for those who just pretend to have a service dog just so they won't leave their baby behind are being very inconsiderate of not only the people with disabilities but also to other customers and the business owners. I wish they was more strict requirements on how to register a service dog. My thought was having maybe registration papers at hand or an I.D for the k-9. Other than that I don't think legislature will make an effort to make a change to this issue.

Texas abortion ruling draws protest at Houston Planned Parenthood

  1. http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-abortion-ruling-draws-protest-at-Houston-4939383.php?cmpid=htx
  2. Category of issue: Abortion
  3. Level of Issue: National
  4. This issue affects individuals and families.
  5. Why does this issue affect individuals/families? This issue affects the process of a woman being able to have an abortion. Abortions providers will have admitting privileges to hospitals that may not be in the area for many women.
  6. What are your views on this issue? Like I mention before I believe that Abortion clinics should be readily available to most cities and rural areas where pregnancy rates are higher. I agree  with the provision of not having an abortion after the 5th month which is about 20 weeks. Back to the admitting privileges, to be honest I don't fully understand it. I am thinking it means that abortions providers will have the privileges to admit patients but only at hospital, meaning it may be out of reach for some women and it will cost much more. If I grasped the idea correctly then I disagree with that completely.

Texas student to see healthier snacks in 2014

  1. http://smmercury.com/2013/07/16/texas-student-to-see-healthier-snacks-in-2014/
  2. Category of issue or problem: Health 
  3. Level of issue or problem: State Level
  4. Who is affected? All students in Texas going to public schools.
  5. Why does it affect individuals/families? The children going to Texas public schools will benefit from changing their snacking habits. Therefore these healthy eating habits start early and become a lifestyle, and hopefully help reduce obesity among children.
  6. What are your views on this issue? I believe that this is a great idea, I don't see why some school districts are now just now transitioning to a healthier standard. I understand funding, and money can be a burden on certain school but studies have shown that children will still eat the healthier version of a cookie per say. The transition may not be easy it does take many years, but schools who are considered poor should be the main ones pushing healthy eating onto their students that way those students take that knowledge back home where the source of their food comes from.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Insurance for the young could be less than $50 a month


1. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/28/health-website-down-verizon/3286203/

2. Category of Problem/Issue identified in article: Health/Medical

3. Level of problem/issue: National Level

4.An “enacted” policy that has been passed to help with a problem/issue that individuals/families face

5. Why this is important to individuals/families OR How does this affect individuals/families:
This is important to families and individuals who are uninsured.  It affects them by giving them a low rate for insurance.

6. What are your views on the issue/policy?
My view on this is that it is a great price for those uninsured.  The Health and Human Services determined that there are close to 3 million adults between 18 years old and 34 years old living in the 34 states that could provide insurance for $50 or less. 46% of those young people could pay for the bronze plan, which would be less than $50 month.  Some of the other uninsured people could pay around $100 per month and would include tax credits. Because of many people against it, makes a statement by saying that it is "less than your cellphone bill; less than your cable bill."  I could agree with that because there are people in my neighborhood back at home that don't have functioning windows in their home, no A/C and sometimes no vehicles, but they have cable.  It is funny how some people will choose as necessities.  My mom has cut off our cable before to make sure that other bills our taken care of, and sometimes will cancel it when none of us are really home.  I believe that health insurance is more important than cable but not everyone thinks alike.  I could only assume that people would not want to pay for it because it is not something that we use everyday, such as cable or cell phones.  I haven't gone to the doctor in a year since I haven't needed to, so I would not like to pay every month for a service I am not using, but when there's an emergency then that is when it is great to have insurance.  I am under my moms insurance which is great, so I don't really have to deal with this healthcare.gov problem that everyone is facing, at least until I am no longer under my mothers insurance.  I think that reminding people what's important, such as HEALTH, could get some to cooperate with the new healthcare system. 

Mercury from Gold Rush days reaching land below old mines


1. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/28/mercury-gold-rush-california/3191565/

2. Category of Problem/Issue identified in article: Environment

3. Level of problem/issue: State Level

4.A problem/issue that individuals/families face

5. Why this is important to individuals/families OR How does this affect individuals/families:
This important to everyone's general health in California.  It affects their health in a bad way, so they need to be informed.

6. What are your views on the issue/policy?
  My views on this problem is that there needs to be some short term and long term solutions in the works.  The problem here is that there is mercury left from the Gold Rush that will last for thousands of years.  Although it is not as bad as radiation, it is still terrible for anyones health.  The mercury has been making its way down every time major foods happen, which can lead to mercury entering the food chain and eventually making its way to the San Fransisco Bay.  Because environmental factors were not something to worry about in the 1850s, pollution prevention was not a high priority.  The use of mercury during this time was to separate the gold from the sand and gravel, leaving all the workers to dump hundreds of pounds of mercury into the area.  Making its way down with each food, scientists believe that ther is enough mercury to contaminate the valley and below that for more than 10,000 years (reported in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences).  The biggest problem is that if it makes its way all the way down, it will affect all the soil, therefor affecting our food that is harvested.  This would leave us with less resources and affect all the producers in that area.  This is a big deal. I think that there should be a short term resolution while they take time to work on a long term resolution. I think that at least having a short term resolution for now is better than doing nothing at all.

U.S. judge strikes down Texas abortion limits


1. http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/nation-now/2013/10/28/texas-abortion-limits-struck-down/3289111/

2. Category of Problem/Issue identified in article: Health/Medical

3. Level of problem/issue: State Level

4.A problem/issue that individuals/families face

5. Why this is important to individuals/families OR How does this affect individuals/families:
This is important to all women, because it affects them more than anyone else.  It affects those that work in the abortion industry as well. 

6. What are your views on the issue/policy?
My view on this is that it is great that federal judge Lee Yeakel struck down the new abortion restrictions.  Because of the size and population of Texas,  it is one of the most important states to fight about abortion laws. Experts see this as one of the tipping points on the abortion issue.  The abortion rights activists expressed, "Today's ruling marks an important victory for Texas women and sends a clear message to lawmakers: it is unconstitutional for politicians to pass laws that take personal, private decisions away from women and their doctors."  I couldn't agree more.  I don't think that it is right for men to make decisions such as this that affect womens' health.  This is a different kind of law that affects individuals.  I would understand if this was a law such as not smoking indoors, which would affect other individuals, but this is different.  If a woman chooses to have an abortion, it does not affect you in any way, so why worry about it.  It is entirely an individuals decision.  Of course, Gov. Rick Perry vowed to continue the fight, and does not care to stop, saying the ruling "will not stop our ongoing efforts to protect life."  I was once pro-life and though it was wrong to kill an innocent child, but then I started to learn that if I am not responsible for that child, then it is none of my business.  Also changing my perspective is to think, "what if I were pregnant right now, would I consider abortion?"  Although I don't think I could ever have one, if I were in that position of an unplanned pregnancy, I would consider it and like to have the option just incase things go wrong in my personal life.  I personally wouldn't want to give up a child because it was unplanned, but if the circumstances are bad, I wouldn't want to bring that child into that world. 

Monday, October 28, 2013

Despite Rising Sticker Prices, Actual College Costs Stable Over Decade, Study Says

Despite Rising Sticker Prices, Actual College Costs Stable Over Decade, Study Says

1.  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/25/education/despite-rising-sticker-prices-actual-college-costs-stable-over-decade-study-says.html?ref=education&_r=0

2. Category of Problem/Issue identified in article:Tuition

3. Level of problem/issue: National Level

4. A problem/issue that individuals/families face

5. Why this is important to individuals/families OR How does this affect individuals/families:
 Public colleges have seen net prices rise sharply, particularly since the last recession began, as they have raised prices to offset plummeting state aid. There is a difference in what different students pay: those with low incomes pay lower net prices than they did a decade ago, while those who earn more pay more.


6. What are your views on the issue/policy? 
I can believe why the college administrators are worried that they are approaching a breaking point in their ability to keep raising prices. The rise of inexpensive online courses and degree programs, and a decline in the college-age population can be a huge threat to these greedy colleges. I agree with the experts on college pricing say they worry about how that has affected people whose incomes are somewhat above average — those who neither qualify for generous need-based aid, nor are affluent enough to shrug off increases.That is the category I fall under and it is definitely becoming more stressful.

 


Majority of Texas fast food workers on public assistance


Majority of Texas fast food workers on public assistance


1. http://smmercury.com/2013/10/21/majority-of-texas-fast-food-workers-on-public-assistance/

2.  Category of problem: Public Assistance

3.  Level of problem/issue: National

4. This problem affects all families/individuals

5.  Why does this affect individuals/families?
Fast food workers are on public assistance since its a struggle living on minimum wage and without food stamps they would not know what to eat sometimes.

6. My view on this issue is that the owners should evaluate their workers and see that their employees are not just younger workers. They have to do more than show the value of hard work but help others make a living so they can provide for their families. Helping people make a living will really help fuel the economy rather than hurting with millions of workers relying on public assistance. If the restaurant industry is an engine of growth for the Texas economy than workers should not have to depend on health care, food, and other basic expenses.






Update: Scorned ex-boyfriend killed couple, then self



Update: Scorned ex-boyfriend killed couple, then self

1.http://smmercury.com/2013/10/17/police-scorned-ex-boyfriend-shot-couple/

2. Category of Problem/Issue identified in article:Relationships

3. Level of problem/issue: Local/National

4. A problem/issue that individuals/families face

5. Why this is important to individuals/families OR How does this affect individuals/families:
This is important to everyone because this situation could have happened to anyone and it can be very horrific for parents especially when they child is off to college and receives a disturbing call.



What are your views on the issue/policy?
My view on the issue is that young ladies should be more aware about relationships especially on those that have ended. This event was a major eye opener to the students on campus for such a sad event to occur so close to other students. This event could have been worse because someone brought it to my attention that since she was an FM major the ex-boyfriend could have easily enter our classroom or building and got violent that could have possibly harmed us.Although the incident was not taken to the extreme it is still a very tragic event that I would never wish on an enemy.

Friday, October 25, 2013

Animal Food Regulation

F.D.A. Bids to Regulate Animal Food, Acting After Recall and Deaths
New York Times- October 25, 2013

1.   http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/26/health/fda-moves-to-regulate-food-for-animals.html?hp&_r=0

2.   Category of Issue: Health / Food

3.   Level of Issue: National

4.   The article is concerning a potential policy that is being considered to help a problem/issue that individuals/families face

5.   This article is important to individuals/families because of the food we eat each day. Foodborne illnesses could decrease significantly if we regulated the food that our food consumes.

6.   Being a Nutrition major, I cannot even count the amount of time I have had to watch Food, Inc., a documentary which discusses the types of food that are being fed to animals. Even cows have been trained to eat corn because it is a cheaper source of food for the animals. Just because it is cheaper, does not mean it is ok! Although there are strict regulations in place in order to keep the food we consume safe, there aren’t really any regulations in place for the food in which our food eats. As stated in the article, foodborne illnesses could be decreased significantly by these tighter restrictions. In addition for the farm animals to be taken care of a little better, so would our family pets. In this proposed bill, tighter regulations will also occur for pet food and treats. There have been many cases where pets have died or become extremely sick due to a foodborne disease found in their food and treats, jerky being a specific source. People do not often consider what goes into the food we provide for our pets and they should. They are living animals, just like us and deserve to have a good diet as well. As weary as I am about any type of government regulations, I do believe it is important for the food that both humans and animals consume is tightly regulated. Too many foodborne illnesses and deaths have occurred do to a lack of regulation in this area.

 

Hourly Wage Increase

Laborers rally for $11 an hour wage requirement

Austin American Statesman- October 24, 2013


1.   http://www.statesman.com/news/news/laborers-rally-for-11-an-hour-wage-requirement/nbX7z/

2.   Category of Issue: Business / Economy

3.   Level of Issue: State

4.   The article is concerning a potential policy that is being considered to help a problem/issue that individuals/families face

5.   This article is important to individuals/families because the current amount of minimum wage is not enough to keep everyone out of poverty.

6.   Laborers throughout Austin are demanding a pay increase of $11 an hour applying to companies that receive economic incentive packages. This essentially means that a construction worker would be receiving this pay increase. I can’t say that I blame them either. The current minimum wage does not seem to cut it when trying to cover the cost of living. There are many people currently still falling under the poverty line that actually work full time and making minimum wage. I do not think that this is the exact way that the problem should be solved, though. I feel like if we are going to actually be able to cure poverty in America, that minimum wage will have to increase. But then again, it is not always that simple. Wouldn’t the increase in wages also cause an increase of inflation? This problem cannot simply be fixed because it is not plainly black and white. Aside from the increases in wage, I feel like wages should be the same across the nation (at least for food servers anyway). Beginning Rant: As a food server, so often has it occurred that guests would not leave me a decent tip. I noticed it to come from people who were visiting from out of state. The minimum wage for servers in other states is significantly higher than those in Texas; therefore, it is appropriate to leave a 10% tip to those food servers. Because they assume that food servers in Texas and other like states make more than $2.13 an hour, food servers like me often do not make the amount of money we feel is appropriate. So do I support and agree with the laborers demanding a pay increase? Absolutely; however, I feel like it should not be for them alone.

Tighter Rein on Painkillers


F.D.A. Urging a Tighter Rein on Painkillers

New York Times- Oct. 24, 2013

 

1.   http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/25/business/fda-seeks-tighter-control-on-prescriptions-for-class-of-painkillers.html?src=me&ref=general

2.     Category of Issue: Business / Health

3.     Level of Issue: National

4.     The article is concerning a potential policy that is being considered to help a problem/issue that individuals/families face

5.     This article is important to individuals/families because of two reasons. The first reason is that too many people have excess to drugs that they do not need and this policy would prevent that from happening as frequently. The second reason is that the cost of healthcare is increasing, which would make it more difficult for people who are in need of these drugs to get them.

6.     You used to hear about OxyContin a lot more than you do now and I imagine it used to be a lot easier to get on the streets before tighter regulations were enforced. Now, it’s hydrocodone that everyone has. If you had your wisdom teeth removed or you’re in a lot of pain because you threw your back out, “No problem! I can call you in a prescription for that.” More cases than not, there is a valid need for consumers to be taking this narcotic painkiller; however, it is typically given in amounts larger than needed. This makes it easier for consumers to get a hold of it when they need it again, but it also makes it extremely easy for it to get in the wrong hands. The FDA is calling for tighter control on these prescriptions, though. I believe this will affect individuals for two reasons. First of all, this will cause an extremely huge inconvenience to patients who are actually in need of these prescriptions. For some doctors, it is difficult to get a timely appointment, or some patients may even have to drive a ways to see the doctor. In addition, it may even make the waiting list to get into these doctors even longer if everyone has to make appointments. On the other hand though, as stated in the article, of all drug overdose deaths in the US, three quarters are due to prescription drugs (majority of them containing hydrocodone) In order to save quite a few lives (or at least prevent this cause of death), it may be a good idea to put tighter regulations on these narcotic prescription drugs.

Statesman: Increase in Foster Child Deaths Prompts Safety Plan


1.http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local/increase-in-foster-child-deaths-prompts-safety-pla/nbYXd/

2. Category of problem/issue identified in article: Safety of Children

3. Level of problem/issue:National

4. A potential policy that is being considered to help a problem/issue that individuals/families face.

5. Why this is important to individuals/families OR how does this affect individuals/families? 

This affects those individuals/families who are foster parents, foster children, or future foster parents/children. The regulations due to the number of child deaths will become more strict for the children's safety. 

6. What are your views on the issue/policy?

I agree with it. I've seen some foster families that are only in it for the money and they neglect and abuse their kids. My grandpa worked for CPS for several years so I heard a lot of stories. Something definitely needs to change because no child deserves to be abused or neglected especially if they already feel unloved to begin with. It's just really sad that a safety plan has to even be put in place. I think all the new regulations are necessary. They're mostly increasing unannounced visits and making foster parents attend mandatory safety trainings. I think the announced visits are great because foster kids can feel safer because the foster parents won't act up as much not knowing how frequent and when the case workers will show up. This is a great idea and I'm glad they have started to bring light to this unfortunate issue. 




Former Arlington elementary school principal convicted in Florida for sexually enticing a minor

Former Arlington elementary school principal convicted in Florida for sexually enticing a minor
 
 
1.http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/10/former-arlington-principal-convicted-in-florida-for-sexually-enticing-a-minor.html/
2. Category of Problem/Issue identified is: education
3. Level of problem/Issue is at the Local Level
4. A problem/issue that individuals/families face
5. This issue is important for families to be aware of because it has an effect on their children's safety. It also important for families in the Arlington area to know what is going on in their school district.
 
6. I think that this article is disturbing. It is kind of scary that this man had a principal job and had been working in the Arlington ISD for eight years. I think that because of this issue school districts need to be more particular and look into a potential employee more thoroughly. If I was a parent from that district I would make sure my child did not experience any kind of inappropriate behavior from this man and if they had I would seek out professional help. Hopefully by this event occurring it will keep everyone on their toes to help prevent another situation like this one to occur

Judge poised to rule on Texas abortion law as clinics warn they may have to close

Judge poised to rule on Texas abortion law as clinics warn they may have to close
 
 
 
2. Category of Problem/Issue identified in article: Health/Medical
 
3. Level of problem/issue is state level
 
4. A problem/issue that individuals/families face
 
5. This issue is important for individuals that work for abortion clinics and for individuals that support abortions. This issue will have an effect on jobs and the policies in Texas on abortion rights.
 
6. I personally am "Switzerland" on this Texas abortion law policy. I do feel that this will have a negative effect on jobs if clinics start to close down and I think that America has enough unemployment issues. I know that people that work at clinics can go elsewhere to find other jobs but they will most likely have to uproot their families which is another issue within the families. One thing that makes me really nervous about this potential policy is that woman may seek out unsafe abortions. Whatever happens on the 29th I hope that the outcome will result in positive things and not negative things. However, I think the outcome will be the government just having more control over our rights...

Another distressing failure by foster care system

BY EDITORIAL BOARD
Thursday, October 24 2013

The state’s foster care system failed Orion Destany Hamilton.
That’s the way Orion’s father, Brian Hamilton, sees the violent end to his daughter’s short life. He told the American-Statesman’s Andrea Ball and Claire Osborn in a report printed Thursday that he had warned Child Protective Services that Jacob Salas, the man accused of killing his year-old daughter, was a threat to the girl. But Orion’s foster mother, Brian Hamilton’s sister, denied Salas lived with her or frequently visited her apartment. CPS appears to have accepted her word despite public records pointing to the contrary.

“I told them that Jacob was living there, and they didn’t care,” Hamilton told Ball and Osborn.

The foster care system fatally failed Orion Hamilton. We condemn the system’s failures and welcome the state’s announced investigation of Child Protective Services’ handling of Orion’s case.

Eight foster children were killed in fiscal year 2013, which ended Aug. 31, according to a report by the Dallas Morning News. So far this fiscal year, abuse or neglect is suspected in the deaths of three foster children.

Orion’s life began badly and ended tragically. She was taken from her San Antonio home on Oct. 31, 2012, after she was born with methamphetamine in her system. Two months later she was sent to Cedar Park to live with Heather Hamilton, her paternal aunt and the mother of three children ages 3, 5 and 7 fathered by Salas. This past weekend Heather Hamilton was called unexpectedly to work. She asked Salas to babysit. Police say Salas fractured Orion Hamilton’s skull by placing her head between his knee and the floor. She died Sunday.

Heather Hamilton denied Salas — who had previously faced family violence allegations, though charges eventually were dismissed — lived in her Cedar Park apartment. Court documents suggest otherwise, or at least indicate Salas was a frequent visitor to the home.

Brian Hamilton says he picked up the red flag that was Salas and waved it, vainly trying to draw attention to his potentially harmful presence in the home where his daughter lived.

Orion Hamilton’s death follows the July death of 2-year-old Alexandria Hill in her Central Texas foster home. Alexandria’s foster mother, Sherill Small, has been charged with capital murder, accused of slamming the girl’s head on the floor.

The death of Alexandria Hill focused attention on Texas Mentor, a child-placing contractor that finds and approves foster families. The agency failed to properly check the employment status, finances and criminal backgrounds of the Small family. It has since changed its vetting procedures.

Two weeks before Orion’s death, Heather Hamilton had been placed in a program offered through Lutheran Social Services of the South, the state’s largest foster care contractor. The Austin-based child-placing agency says it performed criminal background checks on everyone Heather Hamilton said either lived at or frequently visited her apartment. She did not mention Salas, according to Lutheran Social Services.

This month the state suspended placements of children with Lutheran Social Services’ branch in Garland after two children with health problems died in their North Texas foster homes this summer. The state is investigating whether the children received proper medical care.

We learned after Alexandria Hill’s death that foster families often are financially challenged and foster parents make $650 to $700 a month to care for a foster child. Last year, the state paid 351 private agencies $227 million in taxpayer money to screen and train foster parents and to find the children homes. Placing children in foster homes is big business in Texas.

As we condemn the system’s failures, and mourn another foster child’s death, we keep in mind that individuals and their actions make the system.

Foster care begins with the failure of one or both birth parents. The system fails when the caseworkers, supervisors and contractors fail to find safe foster homes. There’s also the failure by legislators to properly support and fund a system that cared for more than 31,000 foster children last year.

The state’s most vulnerable children, who have so little in life, deserve better. From all of us.



Children
Local
A problem/issue that individuals/families face

This is important because it is dealing with the lives of young children and their safety. It is also focusing on the work of the CPS and how it obviously needs to make some changes for improvement.

The failure by the foster care system is obviously something trending throughout this article. Something is not right here, and the Child Protection Services need to do their job correctly and efficiently. Efficiency is obviously an issue here, as well as a sign of laziness. It seems to me that the CPS is continuing to do their job, but not doing it well. They are letting these children be taken in to these homes where they are violently treated, and some result in deaths that are underserving. Why is this happening? I think that the process that prospective foster care parents go through needs to be more strict and taken more seriously. Just because a person wants to become a foster parent, does not mean that they are always doing this in good will. This is apparent by the death of Orion Hamilton. Through this happening, it is also made clear that the CPS have shown minimum care when being warned of a bad situation. This is a problem. Red flags and warnings from others is something I think should be investigated and acted upon at that exact moment. If a child is possibly in an unsafe environment, and there is a hint or warning of that you better act on it! This article was very upsetting to me, and makes me want to pursue CPS more than ever as a career. I think that this system needs to be renovated and not just seen as you’re typical, every day, blue collar job. These situations are things that need to be taken more seriously. 

Keeping bike trails open overnight requires compromise

BY EDITORIAL BOARD - SPECIAL TO THE AMERICAN-STATESMAN
Monday, October 21 2013

It doesn’t make financial sense to spend $1 million to keep three hike-and-bike trails open to a handful or two of bicyclists overnight. But it poses a moral dilemma to close trails that permit cyclists to bypass congested streets during hours they are more likely to encounter drunken or drug-impaired drivers.
Those dueling perspectives are why the Austin City Council continues to postpone what on the surface seems like a fairly simple deal — to keep trails open at night or close them. Earlier this year, the council initiated a pilot program for the three trails — Butler, Shoal Creek and Johnson Creek. In opening to cyclists (but not pedestrians) beyond curfew hours, the city aimed to test demand of late-night commuters wanting alternative transportation, from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. But the demand didn’t materialize, according to Austin police.

Austin police who patrolled the 23 miles of trails during the evening and morning hours over the past few months said they encountered about 10 people per night riding bikes on those trails, or about one every 45 minutes. It takes about nine officers to cover the patrols and keep cyclists safe. The city had allocated about $350,000 for the patrols for the pilot program. Extending it through another budget year would cost $1 million.

Police Chief Art Acevedo said he would have to divert patrols and resources from community policing initiatives to the trails to keep them safe. That would have been a mistake, given the importance of community policing in preventing and fighting crime. Cutting overtime as the council has done could mean reinstating curfews, which make trail use illegal during those hours. But that is not the best solution given the hazards cyclists face on downtown roads.

A compromise seems the right way to go. Council Member Chris Riley, a cyclist who pushed to lift the trail curfew, wants the council to consider some alternatives to reinstating curfews when the council takes up the issue on Thursday. One of those is to identify key segments of the trails that cyclists are using to bypass dangerous sections of roads, Riley told us. In that way, the trails can steer bicyclists around, over or under roads that are not designed to accommodate vehicles and cyclists safely. Acevedo said as long as such bypasses were small in number, his department could use existing resources to patrol them without hindering neighborhood policing efforts.

Another option, Riley said, is to leave all three trails open 24 hours for cyclists only, as they are now, without adding extra police patrols, beyond what could be done with existing resources: “None of the cyclists are asking for additional cops,” Riley said, but he added that it is Acevedo who is authorized to determine how the department’s resources are deployed.

Acevedo said the department would be better situated in 2015, when 47 new officers have been hired and trained, to adequately police the three trails. Up to then, he wants limited trail use, such as Riley suggested. He acknowledged the problem with downtown streets and the dangers bicyclists encounter from heavy traffic and drunken or impaired drivers. And it is true that bicyclists don’t help themselves when they fail to obey traffic rules.

Whatever happens Thursday won’t likely end the debate over patrolling center city trails around the clock. Riley noted that the boardwalk on Lady Bird Lake, built with transportation bond dollars, is expected to be completed next summer. With 1.3 miles of bridge and trail, it will be open 24 hours. You could have a situation where it is legal to ride on the boardwalk but illegal to ride on trails to which it connects. That is too weird, even for Austin.



Safety/community
Local
A potential policy that is being considered to help a problem/issue that individuals/families face

This is important because it affects not only the cyclists of Austin, but the police staff. This also focuses on the amount of money that is being spent by the city for these restrictions.

I think that the cost of patrolling these trails is ridiculous. Spending one million dollars for a handful of bikers to travel safely at late hours of the night is just crazy to me. One million dollars is a lot of money that could be spent elsewhere on something that I feel could be much more beneficial to the city as a whole. These bikers are just a small ounce of the population that are in need of safety and patrolling. The fact of having up to 9 officers on patrol for these bikers when only one is passing every forty five minutes, if that, is alil much. I think that these officers should be patrolling neighborhoods, and other areas as such to protect more people as a whole and have their job be more significant to the community. I am not at all against the cyclists I just feel that there are ways around these regulations and compromise definitely needs to be made. Compromise is obviously what is going on right now, and I think a lot of it needs to be some limitations on which certain areas can be accessed during these hours. I think that once the Lady Bird Lake boardwalk is complete, and has 24 hour access, that this will help greatly with this dilemma in this trail being more accessible and public. I do see the problem at hand when it comes to the cyclists riding in town around the belligerent drivers, and that this is definitely an issue, and unsafe for them.  I am definitely for the trails being patrolled and these cyclists having a safe way on these trails, but I do think that there need to be some restrictions and changes that are a bit less drastic and less costly than what they are now. 

Council OKs Economic Incentive Rules

Council OKs Economic Incentive Rules

BY MARTY TOOHEY - AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Thursday October 24,2013

Austin set a higher bar Thursday night for any company seeking an economic incentive deal to move here, requiring that any such deal comes with a guarantee that all employees and construction workers earn at least $11 an hour.
Though council members were still debating minutiae at deadline, a City Council majority had agreed late Thursday to add a “living wage” requirement to any economic development deal that involves waiving city taxes. The requirement is part of a larger, more nuanced incentive policy approved by the council that business groups warned could ask too much of interested companies and ultimately push their jobs elsewhere.

Under the new city policies, companies will have to pay workers more than previously required, but companies can also secure a bigger tax discount. The council also gave itself the wiggle room to waive the $11-an-hour standard in exceptional circumstances, such as with a company agreeing to hire ex-convicts and other difficult-to-employ people. In slow economic times, some day laborers could be making near the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, according to labor advocates.

“We have these 11 agreements (the city has signed in recent years), and they’re working, … but I think what we’ve done over time is make economic incentives a right, not a privilege. We need to make it a privilege, not a right,” said Council Member Mike Martinez, who proposed the new incentive policy along with fellow Council Members Laura Morrison and Kathie Tovo.

The new policies are intended, in part, to make the city’s expectations clearer at the outset of negotiations. The council’s tendency to negotiate last-minute provisions into deals blew up in the council’s face this year when an unusually structured, $3.8 million incentive deal between the city and the developer of a downtown JW Marriott hotel fell apart. The two sides disagreed about how much the company, White Lodging, had actually agreed to pay construction workers, which led to the city’s conclusion that White Lodging was paying less than it had promised. The city then terminated the deal, a decision being disputed in court.

Many labor advocates, including Austin Interfaith and the Austin-based Workers Defense Project, had been pushing the city for more than a year to adopt stricter pay standards to accompany any incentive deals. On Thursday, more than 200 people, many of them wearing the orange T-shirts of the Laborers International Union, gathered on the steps of City Hall to call for the $11-an-hour minimum.

Jeff Santori, the business manager for Southwest Laborers’ District Council, said the argument could be summed up as: “It’s about the American dream. … How much is enough for these corporations?”

The vote even drew David Butts, an influential political consultant who has played a key role in the election of every council member save Chris Riley, but who rarely speaks at City Hall.

“It seems incredible to me that this is even a point of discussion … considering the amount of money made by the corporations who’ve come here,” Butts told the council. “There’s a lot of money being made, and they’re not willing to share it, even with the people who helped them earn it.”

A living wage isn’t the only new provision the council approved. Companies seeking economic incentive packages also would have to pay a “prevailing wage” when a prevailing wage would be higher. For instance, some electricians would make $25 or more under prevailing-wage standards, which are established by the federal government — a threshold that labor advocates fought for, but that business groups and the city’s economic-development department said could drive away interested companies.

“No other city in the state of Texas requires a prevailing wage” in economic development packages, nor do peer cities such as Phoenix, Memphis, Raleigh or Denver, said Dave Porter, the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce’s vice senior vice president for economic development. “The more things you add to the branch, the more likely it is the branch will fall.”

“This will cost us jobs,” Mayor Lee Leffingwell said.

The new policy also would lay out nine “community benefits” a company could provide, such as committing to building to certain environmental standards or filling at least 75 percent of new, full-time jobs with current Austin residents. The city would use a matrix to determine the value of those benefits and the overall economic impact of a company; a high enough score could result in the city waiving all of its property taxes over the life of the deal.



Business/work
Local
An enacted policy that has been passed to help with a problem/issue that individuals face

This is important because it affects individuals in the workplace in the Austin area. This can have a great impact on the amount of income that is being brought in and distributed by corporations around Austin.

I think that these new incentive rules are going to have a positive impact on the workers of Austin. It’s about time we actually get what we deserve when it comes to being paid for our work. I think that this will help the attitudes and presentation of workers internally as well. When you feel that you are receiving what you deserve for a certain amount of work, you are more willing to show up and be productive. As a working citizen, getting paid minimum wage at certain jobs where I feel I am working like crazy and not making near what I feel I should be for the work that I put in. I also like the idea of the exceptions that can be allowed for hiring convicts and difficult to employ people. I feel that they should not be paid the same amount as someone with higher standards as an employee, and that everyone should be paid for their specific work standards and positions. I agree greatly with Mr. Butts on the fact that this should not have even had to go through discussion. Corporations do make tons of money and are much too selfish and greedy with it. They should be willing to share this wealth with those employees who are the backbone, and have helped bring in the wealth of the company. The company would be nothing without its hard working employees! 

Spanking's Link to Bad Behavior

1. http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/21/spankings-link-to-bad-behavior/?ref=health

2. Category of problem: Health

3. Level of problem/issue: National Level

4. The article concerns: If spanking leads to bad behavior when the child grows up or is it just bad parenting skills or a child with difficult behavioral issue.

5. Why this is important to individuals/families OR how does this affect individuals/families?
        a. Some studies associate spanking with long-term emotional and behavioral problems. Others find           
           that spanking can be useful disciplinary tool.

6. What are your views on the issue / policy?
        a. Spanking can effectively modify behavior if administered rarely and not too harshly. It is most 
            effective in response to defiant refusal to comply with milder disciplinary tactics, such as time- 
            out.  Physical punishment, as well as other forms of punishment, does not enhance positive 
            development, but only inhibits inappropriate behavior. I believe that spanking is not bad.  
            Sometimes it's the appropriate response to a young child's behavior.  There are other, better 
            ways to discipline a child most of the time, but they require the ability to articulate what's wrong 
            and what needs to change, to oneself as well as to the kids.  The problem that is leading to "bad 
            behavior" might be inadequate parenting skills, or it might be a child with difficult behavioral 
            issues. 


Shutdown snags hope for cure



1.    Horswell, Cindy. (2013, October 20).  Medicine:  Shutdown snags hope for cure.  Houston Chronicle, B3/B5.
2.    Category of problem:  Health
3.    Level of problem:  National level
4.    The article concerns:  Research into a cure for a degenerative nerve disease known as Giant Axonal Neuropathy has been delayed due to the government shutdown.
5.    Why is this important to families / individuals OR how does it affect individuals / families?
a.    Giant Axonal Neuropathy affects only about 70 people worldwide.  But, a potential cure may be on the way if human trials can be approved whereby a therapeutic gene is injected into the fluid of a spinal cord.  And, the family of a Bellaire, Texas teen and his young sister are anxiously awaiting that approval.
6.    What are your views on the issue / policy?
a.    Giant Axonal Neuropathy (GAN) is a very rare neurological disease characterized by awkwardness, muscle weakness and curly hair.  Both parents must carry the gene for it to be passed on to their children.  Few people who have the disorder live past 20 years old.  Human medical trials can be dangerous, but when a person is not expected to live very long because of the syndrome, especially one as exceptional as GAN, then the hopes of a family hinge on the possibility of a cure even if it means a family member is the test subject.  Preliminary studies have indicated a good chance for a cure, and work done with mice has proven relatively successful.  But, this is not all about GAN.  It is as much about the failings of a government hell bent on providing as much anguish as possible to families through the bureaucracy of its own system.  The Bellaire family has been waiting since last December to get clearance from the National Institutes of Health for the human clinical trial approval, and, now, are forced to wait even longer because of the government shutdown.  Surely, similar situations exist in medical research, social programs, defense preparedness and others as a result of the shutdown, too.  The childlike antics of the Democrats, especially the President, and the ineptness of the Republicans to stand their ground on a bad law have caused heartaches with their constituents that they either cannot see or do not care to understand.  While people wait for something that could provide a prospective ‘miracle cure’ for their children, the government – all three branches – act like spoiled kids, and impede the progress of a prospective treatment that could save those children.  It is no wonder that the American people are getting fed up with anything coming out of Washington, DC.